R100 vs R65

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
barryh
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: R100 vs R65

Post by barryh »

"spongy pudd handling"

I wouldn't worry that you are at any great disadvantage with the handling. A twin shock R45/R65 handles very well if the dampers are OK. In terms of feeling quick and nimble they are a revelation compared to an R100.
barry
Cheshire
England
Rob
Posts: 3083
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:05 am

Re: R100 vs R65

Post by Rob »

Yes, your twin-shock R65 still has a much better front end, and the front brake requires no adjustment, while you will get to learn to adjust the caliper on the /7.
You also have electronic ignition and a MUCH MORE organized wiring harness on the R65.

I repeat, keep the R65 for a little while.

OK, Brad - go for it! You owned both of these bikes!
Rob V
User avatar
Gibson
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:45 am

Re: R100 vs R65

Post by Gibson »

I was a long time R65 owner. All true. Great handling airhead. R100 will feel truck like at first. If you can hang onto the R65, Rob's advice is good. The R65 was a little cramped for me so I decided after 60k miles its was time to test other waters.
User avatar
enigmaT120
Posts: 3570
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:25 am
Location: Falls City, OR

Re: R100 vs R65

Post by enigmaT120 »

I wasn't really pleased with the handling of my friend's R100 GSPD after riding my R65. But it's all relative: I'm not pleased with my R65's handling after I ride my Triumph. And my Triumph doesn't handle as well as my Salsa Fargo.
Ed Miller
'81 R65
'70 Bonneville
Falls City, OR

"Gasoline makes people stupid." -- Chuey
"I'll believe corporations are people when the State of Texas executes one." Bumper sticker
User avatar
Gibson
Posts: 219
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:45 am

Re: R100 vs R65

Post by Gibson »

So True!!
Post Reply