That is a good point, that MH said he had offered to pay for Duane's services. It has been quite a while since I read the story and I wrote what I did from what I remembered. Erroneously, I mixed in some feelings/experiences of mine and that did make what I wrote misleading.Steve in Golden wrote:MH wrote:Duane, I explained, the bike banged me up pretty good. I still want to ride it; I really like it. If you want me to haul it to your shop in a truck, I'll do that. You can fix it. I'm happy to pay for the work. I'm not trying to pick your brain so I can fix it myself.
By the way, I think MH is a great writer. He is at least on par with Peter Egan.
Duane says he doesn't remember the conversation. I know I've had a few instances where a customer's approach sends up a red flag. In those instances, I'm sure I could be considered unreasonable. Most of those times, I've seen that I was glad I went with my instincts. A few times, I have wished I had not.
Thanks for pointing that out.
There is something that has intrigued me about this story that I haven't been able to convey yet. What sparked me to write my post about that story is the contrast of two personalities (as I perceive them). I see Duane's approach to things as very pragmatic, practical, cut and dried. Maynard, to me, seems much more of a person who approaches things based on his feelings. I hope this doesn't sound like nonsense to anyone reading it. The thought occurred to me that that disparity could have contributed to the problem between them. It has happened to me. My approach is more in the "Duane camp." It is a wonder that my wife and I get along as well as we do.
Chuey