Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

This is for the discussion of Motorcycling. The art, the science, the theory of all things related to our favorite sport... riding motorcycles.
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by Chuey »

How does an R65 get that much lighter than an R100?

Chuey
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by Major Softie »

Chuey wrote:How does an R65 get that much lighter than an R100?

Chuey
How much lighter? What are you talking about? Did you confuse the posted weight for the Superhawk with our discussion of the R65? I don't see where anyone said that the R65 is much lighter than the R100.
MS - out
User avatar
dougie
Posts: 2540
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:19 pm
Location: Burlington Ontario, Canada

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by dougie »

Chuey wrote:How does an R65 get that much lighter than an R100?
Chuey
According to -
http://www.bmbikes.co.uk/bmwmodels.htm
an R65 is 33 lbs lighter than an R100S and 55 lbs lighter than an R100RS.
I've spent most of my money on women, motorcycles, and beer.
The rest of it I just wasted.
User avatar
enigmaT120
Posts: 3570
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:25 am
Location: Falls City, OR

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by enigmaT120 »

justoneoftheguys wrote:I've come to finally admit that the R65 just doesn't have what it takes to burn up miles on the interstate.
I can't really agree with that, though the bike is heavy enough to make it a moot point in the rest of the discussion. Mine has no problem going 90 mph for as long as I want, right down I5 a couple of times. Maybe the Windjammer helps, as it makes it seem a non-event. That's only about 6,000 rpms or so.

I think it's a good bike for one-up touring.
Ed Miller
'81 R65
'70 Bonneville
Falls City, OR

"Gasoline makes people stupid." -- Chuey
"I'll believe corporations are people when the State of Texas executes one." Bumper sticker
Deleted User 287

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by Deleted User 287 »

enigmaT120 wrote: Mine has no problem going 90 mph for as long as I want, right down I5 a couple of times. Maybe the Windjammer helps, as it makes it seem a non-event. That's only about 6,000 rpms or so.
90mph at 6000 RPM? You must be believing what your Motometer is telling you.

And yes, I would imagine that a Windjammer would make a difference in suffering headwinds for hours on end. Semper Gumby on R65.org has proven that.
User avatar
dougie
Posts: 2540
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:19 pm
Location: Burlington Ontario, Canada

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by dougie »

An RZ350 would be a lot of fun, can be found (in Canada), and not expensive.
Image
But I don't think the ergonomics would be friendly to my body anymore.
Also I know what I am like with a 2-stroke that "comes on the pipe". I would either get in trouble, or hurt myself, or both.
I've spent most of my money on women, motorcycles, and beer.
The rest of it I just wasted.
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by Sibbo »

Poor man's Ducati ? Suzuki SV 650 ? I seriously considered one before buying the BeeM, the main difficulty for me was no luggage standard and difficult to find good aftermarket .

They are quite cheap s/h here .
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
User avatar
dougie
Posts: 2540
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:19 pm
Location: Burlington Ontario, Canada

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by dougie »

Sibbo wrote:Poor man's Ducati ? Suzuki SV 650 ? I seriously considered one before buying the BeeM, the main difficulty for me was no luggage standard and difficult to find good aftermarket .
They are quite cheap s/h here .
I have ridden a 650 V-Strom.
I found that particular model to be generic and boring, but the engine was sweet. It had that tractor torque that a 90 degree v-twin is known for.
A friend of mine says an SV is like a Ducati that works properly all the time. :lol:
I've spent most of my money on women, motorcycles, and beer.
The rest of it I just wasted.
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by Sibbo »

The Strom is a bit bulky but the sports V looks pretty good, I haven't ridden one but i like Suzukis, they are usually excellent quality .
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
godot
Posts: 737
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 11:56 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Re: Remember my "Interesting Bike" thread?

Post by godot »

enigmaT120 wrote:I think it's a good bike for one-up touring.
I agree. And I ain't got no Windjammer, just the dinky plastic pseudo fairing on the LS. I wouldn't think it'd matter much, but I know there's a small power difference between the 79/80 R65s and the 81 and up versions, in addition to the clutch and ignition. I also tend to pack light on trips, which might help some.
R65LS
Post Reply