K1600
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Wasn't there an inline-six Honda a while back too?Major Softie wrote:Second, I love this quote: "Lightest and most compact serial production 6-cylinder in-line engine in a motorcycle > 1000 cc." Uh, could someone please tell me the list of engines that qualify for: "serial production 6-cylinder in-line engine in a motorcycle > 1000 cc"
I know there was that Kawasaki . . . can't think of another.
What does its competition weigh?Then: "Both the low engine weight and the consistent lightweight construction of the vehicle as a whole contribute to the low weight of the vehicle. At 703 lbs. (K 1600 GT without panniers) and 767 lbs. (K 1600 GTL with panniers and topcase)"
What the hell has happened to the motorcycle industry that nearly 800 lbs is trumpeted as being revolutionarily light weight?
I thought the CBX was just under 1000cc, but I've checked, and it was over 1000, so, yes, you would think that it would qualify, but, as it turns out, apparently it does not:The Veg wrote:Wasn't there an inline-six Honda a while back too?Major Softie wrote:Second, I love this quote: "Lightest and most compact serial production 6-cylinder in-line engine in a motorcycle > 1000 cc." Uh, could someone please tell me the list of engines that qualify for: "serial production 6-cylinder in-line engine in a motorcycle > 1000 cc"
I know there was that Kawasaki . . . can't think of another.
Yeah, that's kinda my point: it makes it appear that the whole class has become ridiculously heavy. On the other hand, what IS the "class?"The Veg wrote:What does its competition weigh?Major Softie wrote:What the hell has happened to the motorcycle industry that nearly 800 lbs is trumpeted as being revolutionarily light weight?