Boxerworks.com

https://youtu.be/sf3KG8VAtJg

http://www.vozzhelmets.com/

It needs an internal visor option.

If it passes the AUS/NZ standard, it'll meet the ECE standard to. The Oz standard is currently being sorted between the individual states here for consistency, the ECE is now the accepted standard.

In emergency circumstances, for neck protection, it needs a screwdriver to remove the helmet.

Cost to follow....

S'pose the first thing to take your eye Steve, is the ability to more easily remove the helmet from a road trauma victim.

Does a well fitted strap injure riders?

It would be nice if it was really quiet.

ME 109 wrote:S'pose the first thing to take your eye Steve, is the ability to more easily remove the helmet from a road trauma victim.

Does a well fitted strap injure riders?

Not that I'm aware of. This helmet requires know-how and a flat screwdriver to undo 2 lateral screws to remove it for airway access. The front is removed forwards and down towards the chest.

Garnet, they claim quiet but don't most of them!

SteveD wrote:

ME 109 wrote:S'pose the first thing to take your eye Steve, is the ability to more easily remove the helmet from a road trauma victim.

Does a well fitted strap injure riders?

Not that I'm aware of. This helmet requires know-how and a flat screwdriver to undo 2 lateral screws to remove it for airway access. The front is removed forwards and down towards the chest.

Garnet, they claim quiet but don't most of them!

Is the purpose of the helmet design to aid in such a removal?

I'd be curious to see how they do the hinge. That, and the catch mechanisms are the weak links... (video doesn't work in USA)

ME 109 wrote:

SteveD wrote:

ME 109 wrote:S'pose the first thing to take your eye Steve, is the ability to more easily remove the helmet from a road trauma victim.

Does a well fitted strap injure riders?

Not that I'm aware of. This helmet requires know-how and a flat screwdriver to undo 2 lateral screws to remove it for airway access. The front is removed forwards and down towards the chest.

Garnet, they claim quiet but don't most of them!

Is the purpose of the helmet design to aid in such a removal?

Presumably, plus it seems to lend itself to the strapless feature.

SteveD wrote:

ME 109 wrote:

SteveD wrote:

ME 109 wrote:S'pose the first thing to take your eye Steve, is the ability to more easily remove the helmet from a road trauma victim.

Does a well fitted strap injure riders?

Not that I'm aware of. This helmet requires know-how and a flat screwdriver to undo 2 lateral screws to remove it for airway access. The front is removed forwards and down towards the chest.

Garnet, they claim quiet but don't most of them!

Is the purpose of the helmet design to aid in such a removal?

Presumably, plus it seems to lend itself to the strapless feature.

Getting cloudy now. Does one take the helmet off on arrival at the pub, with a screwdriver?

ME 109 wrote:

SteveD wrote:

ME 109 wrote:

SteveD wrote:

ME 109 wrote:S'pose the first thing to take your eye Steve, is the ability to more easily remove the helmet from a road trauma victim.

Does a well fitted strap injure riders?

Not that I'm aware of. This helmet requires know-how and a flat screwdriver to undo 2 lateral screws to remove it for airway access. The front is removed forwards and down towards the chest.

Garnet, they claim quiet but don't most of them!

Is the purpose of the helmet design to aid in such a removal?

Presumably, plus it seems to lend itself to the strapless feature.

Getting cloudy now. Does one take the helmet off on arrival at the pub with a screwdriver?

Only by licensed rescue personnel.

Hydration tube.