data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74846/74846e9b7c1fc6912fc3cfdad38bc1e9596ca5e5" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64e86/64e86fbbd792e6770fa992fd78810576e0d75ff1" alt="Image"
Indeed they are nice looking bikes. And I give Triumph credit for emphasizing the traditional styling cues, at least on certain models. Arguably that is perhaps the prime factor that has made Harley Davidson the marketing powerhouse it has been, now for decades. (Not that there is anything wrong with that--Seinfeld)khittner1 wrote:Gee, those new/old Triumphs are nice looking bikes! . . .
Ken, you are so correct. A new built /7 or R100? Ural can sort of do it. The people from India build various new old stuff. I think folks would like the BMW new old brand. Kind of like dreaming that your favorite sports time will be successful.Ken in Oklahoma wrote:khittner1 wrote:Gee, those new/old Triumphs are nice looking bikes! . . .
But of course BMW A.G. is a thoroughly modern, forward reaching company. Sigh!
Ken
Me either. I'm guessing that the history of that Triumph goes something like this:bbelk wrote:I have never owned a bike that clean in my life.