Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
mefrank11
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by mefrank11 »

am I missing something it seems that these pictures have been posted many times and never seen the finished bike Frank
User avatar
gspd
Posts: 1041
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:04 pm

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by gspd »

You're not missing anything.
Melville simply works in verrrry slooooow motion.
I think he does a lot of chillin' when he's not wrenchin' :o
Mechanic from Hell
"I remember every raging second of it...
My bike was on fire, the road was on fire, and I was on fire.
It was the best ride ever!"
User avatar
melville
Posts: 1814
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by melville »

gspd wrote:You're not missing anything.
Melville simply works in verrrry slooooow motion.
I think he does a lot of chillin' when he's not wrenchin' :o
Yep. Chillin'

Trying to freeze up some $$$ to finish it up.
Call me Mel. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me at home, I thought I would ride about a little and see the other parts of the world.
User avatar
melville
Posts: 1814
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by melville »

Played mit the electrics today. Hooked up the battery, turned the key, and got taillight, a BZZZZRT from the TS relay that eventually resolved into a "blink blink" but I don't appear to have dash lights as yet (hard to say--it was really bright out today) and just something going "tick" inside the headlight shell when I hit the start button. I'd been hoping to turn it over and check for oil flow to the top end, but no hurry there.

I should be able to turn the thing over even without the trans attached, no? I've jumped the neutral switch wires, without the jump I don't get the "tick" from the headlight shell. I also cleaned up the starter relay spades, to no avail. Presently, with no trans I have the ground going to the chassis, I'll try running the ground to the engine case next.
Call me Mel. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me at home, I thought I would ride about a little and see the other parts of the world.
Chuey
Posts: 7632
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by Chuey »

[quote="gspd"]
Melville simply works in verrrry slooooow motion.

He's doing just fine. For the quality and detail he's putting into this project, it seems to be moving along at a fine rate. I can't discipline myself to take so many interesting before and after pictures. Also, remember, he is a married man, and he probably wants to keep that status.

Chuey
User avatar
melville
Posts: 1814
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by melville »

Chuey wrote:
gspd wrote: Melville simply works in verrrry slooooow motion.
He's doing just fine. For the quality and detail he's putting into this project, it seems to be moving along at a fine rate. I can't discipline myself to take so many interesting before and after pictures. Also, remember, he is a married man, and he probably wants to keep that status.

Chuey
The pace is called (credit Peter Egan?) "burning the candle at neither end." I find I get the best results if I am not hurried on something like this. I am married to a fine woman who provided me with this project, and as such she maintains some control over the process. Presently she says "no money" and I'm OK with that.

If I had all the stuff right now, I'd probably have project paralysis anyway (What to do next?). I'm just picking off a bit at a time, trying to get each bit right. Thanks to all y'all for your patience and assistance.
Call me Mel. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me at home, I thought I would ride about a little and see the other parts of the world.
Deleted User 62

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by Deleted User 62 »

melville wrote:I should be able to turn the thing over even without the trans attached, no? I've jumped the neutral switch wires, without the jump I don't get the "tick" from the headlight shell. I also cleaned up the starter relay spades, to no avail. Presently, with no trans I have the ground going to the chassis, I'll try running the ground to the engine case next.
You should be able to turn the engine with a large screwdriver by shorting the positive connection at the starter to the connector of the other smaller wire to the solenoid. Get the gen and oil lights working first.
User avatar
melville
Posts: 1814
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:32 am

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by melville »

Well it's been a coupla weeks. My rear tire has finally arrived, four months after the order. I still need to get the right wedding band before I get it mounted up.

Back to the things I'm actually working on presently. It appears that while there are different PNs for throttle and clutch cables for use with high and low bars, there is only one /6 brake cable for us remote MC people. I was having difficulty routing the brake cable, trying to run it as it had gone before with high bars, never getting the smooth feel I wanted from it. I decided to use a piece of bicycle cable housing cut to the same length as the BMW cable to try different cable routing schemes. For clarity, I used white housing. Here's how it was, running with high bars:

Image

This gives the options topside of running it this way, which was really notchy as the cable went through its travel:

Image

Or this way, which had issues with cable tension changes as the fork was moved from stop to stop:

Image

With the bicycle housing, this routing seemed possible:

Image

Which gave a topside look like so:

Image

Running the actual BMW cable that way, but not committing to a complete hookup, seems to solve the "notchy" and "tension" problems but I'm having difficulty believing that BMW intended the cable to run that way with low bars. Is that the correct routing?
Call me Mel. Some years ago- never mind how long precisely- having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me at home, I thought I would ride about a little and see the other parts of the world.
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by Major Softie »

Don't know, but it doesn't matter: if it works, it works.
MS - out
Deleted User 62

Re: Woo Hoo! A Big Project!

Post by Deleted User 62 »

With the bicycle housing, this routing seemed possible:

Image

Which gave a topside look like so:

Image

Running the actual BMW cable that way, but not committing to a complete hookup, seems to solve the "notchy" and "tension" problems but I'm having difficulty believing that BMW intended the cable to run that way with low bars. Is that the correct routing?[/quote] That is the way it is routed in the factory sales brochure.
Post Reply