Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

ME 109 · Post by **ME 109** » Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:11 pm

Duane Ausherman wrote:
sterob wrote:
Duane Ausherman wrote:OK, now I see what all the fuss is about. I want to equivocally state that that is not Diane. Don't argue with me, I am dead sure about that.

That photo is funny.

I see we are in the 'weird' part of Boxerworks again........
Should I have said unequivocally, not equivocally?

I think any sort of quivering.

Chuey · Post by **Chuey** » Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:18 pm

What was Valdez doing while he was away? One thing you can be sure of. He wasn't getting his eyes fixed!

Chuey

Rob · Post by **Rob** » Sun Mar 02, 2014 8:37 pm

sorry - I have looked at a handful (ha ha) of pictures of naked women in my life, and that one is just not jumping out at me.

Major Softie · Post by **Major Softie** » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:02 pm

Duane Ausherman wrote: Should I have said unequivocally, not equivocally?

"Equivocally" is funnier.

I knew it wasn't Diane. She has bigger balloons, and they are far less perky.

SteveD · Post by **SteveD** » Sun Mar 02, 2014 9:16 pm

ME 109 · Post by **ME 109** » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:43 pm

Major Softie wrote:
I knew it wasn't Diane. She has bigger balloons, and they are far less perky.

The tank woman could give yer a good right hook!

Rob · Post by **Rob** » Sun Mar 02, 2014 11:53 pm

ME 109 wrote:
Major Softie wrote:
I knew it wasn't Diane. She has bigger balloons, and they are far less perky.
The tank woman could give yer a good right hook!

It does look a bit Brutish! (sound better than Popeyish!)

Scoots · Post by **Scoots** » Mon Mar 03, 2014 9:28 am

An eBay update: "43 people are viewing this item per hour" with 78 watchers!

Still, there have been no bidders! What's up with that???

Rob · Post by **Rob** » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:05 am

I haven't looked at it in at least 7 hours.

SteveD · Post by **SteveD** » Mon Mar 03, 2014 6:24 pm

Scoots wrote:An eBay update: "43 people are viewing this item per hour" with 78 watchers!

Still, there have been no bidders! What's up with that???

$8000 is a high start price

The paint doesn't look oem to some..too "thick" with the dark accents. The oem helmet sticker for the tank that appeared at this time is also missing.
It does look too unmarked especially around the buckle zone adjacent to the seat. Also, looking at the fuel cap and the handlebar controls, there seems to be what looks like age markings/corrosion/nqr appearance which may be inconsistent with claims.

This is a 30+ year bike and the colour scheme is one that fades. It's in very sunny and hot Queensland and would by most probabilities have at least some fading.

Better detailed closeup shots would help a prospective buyer.

Boxerworks.com

Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???

Re: Unfair sales technique for '81 R100RS???