K75 GS

This is for the discussion of Motorcycling. The art, the science, the theory of all things related to our favorite sport... riding motorcycles.
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

K75 GS

Post by Sibbo »

I posted this up in K bikes but I don't reckon too many people wander through that section .... so here we go again .
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K75 GS

I've always like K75s , they have an excellent engine ,smooth , powerful and fast . The trouble is I like to ride off road ,not roadless these days or with a bike this heavy but definitely dirt roads .Australia has lots of great dirt rides .

This home built version of the K75 might be the best K75 I've ever seen ,for my use anyway .


Power Weight: Net:
M (about 3 L in the tank = V + H = 90 +115 = 205 KG
P: 75 hp
M / P = 205/75 = 2.73 lbs / hp
LT size: 280 / 100 = 2.8 kg / hp
Gross:
GS: 305/75 = 4.07 lbs / hp
LT: 380 / 100 = 3.8 kg / hp

and yes , it needs a bashplate , preferably a thick one .

http://translate.google.com/translate?h ... rmd%3Divns

Here's a photo ,not of this chap's bike but another .


Image


and another


Image

What do you think of it ?
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: K75 GS

Post by Major Softie »

They're both nice conversion jobs. It's just that the K75 feels so top-heavy in standard trim that it would be my last choice for a GS conversion.
MS - out
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: K75 GS

Post by Sibbo »

Yeah ,a good comment .It's just that it's a beautiful engine , one of my favourites. 75 hp ands 67 mpg Imp .I like good fuel economy and that's really one of my complaints against my ST.Half as much fuel again as a K75 and 2/3 the hp . :roll:
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
Garnet
Posts: 3108
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 6:24 pm
Location: Victoria BC Canada

Re: K75 GS

Post by Garnet »

What gearing options are there for K bikes? Stock might be a bit tall.

K bikes are getting pretty cheap and R GSs are getting awfully expensive.
Garnet

Image
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: K75 GS

Post by Sibbo »

Garnet wrote:What gearing options are there for K bikes? Stock might be a bit tall.

K bikes are getting pretty cheap and R GSs are getting awfully expensive.
Yes , that could be a real short coming .A K75 diff is 37/11 ,the gear box final or 4th anyway would be 1:1 wouldn't it ?
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
Deleted User 287

Re: K75 GS

Post by Deleted User 287 »

I know it's just a well-done Photoshop, and not even close to a G/S, but...

Image
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: K75 GS

Post by Sibbo »

My ,my , wouldn't that slip along ! :D
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: K75 GS

Post by Sibbo »

Sibbo wrote:
Garnet wrote:What gearing options are there for K bikes? Stock might be a bit tall.

K bikes are getting pretty cheap and R GSs are getting awfully expensive.
Yes , that could be a real short coming .A K75 diff is 37/11 ,the gear box final or 4th anyway would be 1:1 wouldn't it ?
Woops ...I'm wrong .This conversion uses a R1100GS rear end .It should be quite good with those ratios .The forks are R100GS.Reading up on the R1100GS rear ,it seems to be the preferred conversion for R1150 owners who are tired of stalling .

Final drive...3.0:1 (33:11)
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
User avatar
Sibbo
Posts: 5637
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:18 am
Location: Oz , half way up ,sitting on a wet spot .

Re: K75 GS

Post by Sibbo »

Power Weight: Net:
M (about 3 L in the tank = V + H = 90 +115 = 205 KG
P: 75 hp
M / P = 205/75 = 2.73 lbs / hp
LT size: 280 / 100 = 2.8 kg / hp
Gross:
GS: 305/75 = 4.07 lbs / hp
LT: 380 / 100 = 3.8 kg / hp

About the same weight as my ST but 25 more hp . :D
"You ain't gonna learn what you don't want to know"
The Grateful Dead
Ridercam
Posts: 379
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 9:50 am

Re: K75 GS

Post by Ridercam »

I can understand the love of a fine engine. But for a modern parts full available bike...I might look at this triple as well. It is proving to be the BMW R800GS killer. The 800 cc engine will deliver a few lees horse power than in the Dayton model (where it delivers 124bhp and 53lb/ft). SO, with a total weight of 440lbs and a power of aprox. 110 HP, the Triumph 800 will be lighter and a little more powerful than the BMW F800GS. With a price point around 10k - makes the bike seem reasonable in comparison. Built in Thailand (as will Ducati this year) these bikes represent a new direction for "European motorcycles".
Image
I always brake in corners and think how I am going to get home if I really mess up. When I get home, I wished that I hadn't used my brakes and should have ridden a bit further.
Post Reply