For what its worth

This is for the discussion of Motorcycling. The art, the science, the theory of all things related to our favorite sport... riding motorcycles.
User avatar
Airbear
Posts: 2887
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:02 am
Location: Oz, lower right hand side, in a bit, just over the lumpy part.

Re: For what its worth

Post by Airbear »

The Village People moustache is a nice touch, but I miss the beret.
Charlie
and Brunhilde - 1974 R90/6
Image

Graduate, Wallace and Gromit School of Engineering and Design (Pending)
User avatar
Zombie Master
Posts: 8821
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:21 am
Location: Vancouver Island BC Canada

Re: For what its worth

Post by Zombie Master »

Airbear wrote:The Village People moustache is a nice touch, but I miss the beret.
What beret?
Any and all disclaimers may apply
Major Softie
Posts: 8900
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:46 pm

Re: For what its worth

Post by Major Softie »

Oh god. Here we go again...
MS - out
User avatar
bbelk
Posts: 1722
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: For what its worth

Post by bbelk »

Hey ZM & Michael: On every review I read about the 800GS, they mention the vibration. What was your impression of it? How would it compare to an Airhead.

Brad
1975 R90/6
1979 R65
User avatar
enigmaT120
Posts: 3570
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:25 am
Location: Falls City, OR

Re: For what its worth

Post by enigmaT120 »

Good question. My R 65's motor is smoother than the single cylinder F 650 motor but the F 650 has real suspension. Wait, isn't the 800 a twin?
Ed Miller
'81 R65
'70 Bonneville
Falls City, OR

"Gasoline makes people stupid." -- Chuey
"I'll believe corporations are people when the State of Texas executes one." Bumper sticker
User avatar
Zombie Master
Posts: 8821
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:21 am
Location: Vancouver Island BC Canada

Re: For what its worth

Post by Zombie Master »

bbelk wrote:Hey ZM & Michael: On every review I read about the 800GS, they mention the vibration. What was your impression of it? How would it compare to an Airhead.

Brad
There are some vibes but not objectionable IMO. A bit more intense and higher frequency at upper rpm's compared to a good airhead, smoother at low revs in normal commuter mode. After three weeks of daily riding in the Alps, it never was a problem. I think it's difficult to argue against the parallel twin for a motorcycle application. :twisted:
Any and all disclaimers may apply
User avatar
bbelk
Posts: 1722
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: For what its worth

Post by bbelk »

Zombie Master wrote:
bbelk wrote:Hey ZM & Michael: On every review I read about the 800GS, they mention the vibration. What was your impression of it? How would it compare to an Airhead.

Brad
There are some vibes but not objectionable IMO. A bit more intense and higher frequency at upper rpm's compared to a good airhead, smoother at low revs in normal commuter mode. After three weeks of daily riding in the Alps, it never was a problem. I think it's difficult to argue against the parallel twin for a motorcycle application. :twisted:
Getting out of Texas requires a mind and butt numbing day of travel at 70 - 80 MPH. In pretty places, I am happy at 60, but going 60 on a Texas interstate is not a safe thing. Is "a bit more intense" something you could stand for a day?
1975 R90/6
1979 R65
The Veg
Moderator
Posts: 2847
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:34 am
Location: Larryville Jawja
Contact:

Re: For what its worth

Post by The Veg »

If you wanna gitthefuckoutta TexSux at good speed, just go straight to the big-bore K-Bike. Those things can MOVE.

I've heard nothing but good about the 800s, but they're too small for my ergonomic comfort.
Cogito Ergo Moto
----------------
"A bunch of weirdos with old motorcycles can never be boring." -Doug West
"It just wouldn't be a complete day if I didn't forget something!" -Me
User avatar
bbelk
Posts: 1722
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:13 pm

Re: For what its worth

Post by bbelk »

The Veg wrote:If you wanna gitthefuckoutta TexSux at good speed, just go straight to the big-bore K-Bike. Those things can MOVE.

I've heard nothing but good about the 800s, but they're too small for my ergonomic comfort.
It has to fit in the back of my truck and the R65 is tight:

Image
1975 R90/6
1979 R65
User avatar
Zombie Master
Posts: 8821
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:21 am
Location: Vancouver Island BC Canada

Re: For what its worth

Post by Zombie Master »

bbelk wrote:
Zombie Master wrote:
bbelk wrote:Hey ZM & Michael: On every review I read about the 800GS, they mention the vibration. What was your impression of it? How would it compare to an Airhead.

Brad
There are some vibes but not objectionable IMO. A bit more intense and higher frequency at upper rpm's compared to a good airhead, smoother at low revs in normal commuter mode. After three weeks of daily riding in the Alps, it never was a problem. I think it's difficult to argue against the parallel twin for a motorcycle application. :twisted:
Getting out of Texas requires a mind and butt numbing day of travel at 70 - 80 MPH. In pretty places, I am happy at 60, but going 60 on a Texas interstate is not a safe thing. Is "a bit more intense" something you could stand for a day?
I don't find it a problem, but when forced to ride the autoban a bigger mulit cylinder machine, as the Veg recommended would be better, but when you arrive on the roads we really want to be on the larger machine is a drag. If you are on a chain drive model changing gearing is a piece of cake, and with 6 speeds you have a lot of gears to choose from. The F800R that I rented has lower gearing to enhance performance in town, which was great for the Alps bur may have been a bit of a detriment on the autoban. In Canada where bikes cost a bit more than Stateside, the F800R is about $10,000. I think that is great value. If you are coming from an airhead the 800cc parallel twin will be a revelation for power, and the fuel economy is astounding. Sometimes I wonder why I bothered with my new KTM 990 SMT. Yes it has more performance, higher end suspension, but in terms of cost, efficiency, and ease of maintenance, the 800 makes much more sense.

You have a lot of choices with the 800 engine in terms of riding style. I feel the GS version when fully loaded is heavier than it should be. I have a buddy who spent a bunch of money of a GS800 and got if fully loaded under 400pds, but I think that would cost a lot, but would be a great machine.
Any and all disclaimers may apply
Post Reply