Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Discuss all things 1970 & later Airheads right here.
r67boxer
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:11 am

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by r67boxer »

Kurt in S.A. wrote: Mon Sep 16, 2024 7:10 pm Interesting bend...I'm sure if it were straight, the bike would sit better. Probably a little bit of bend results in quite a bit of lift to the bike.

Kurt
Yup. I hadn't looked at it from that angle. It's likely that someone sat on the bike with the side stand down.

Kevin
Rob Frankham
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: Scotland UK, 20 miles from civilisation up a dead end road!
Contact:

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by Rob Frankham »

I think the bend is part of the design to clear the exhaust...

Yup, just went and looked at the stand on my /6 which is identical and has bends in exactly the same points.

Rob
ImageImageImage
User avatar
SteveD
Posts: 4909
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Oz.

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by SteveD »

The sidestand might have a factory installed kink :?:

Image

Image
Cheers, Steve
Victoria, S.E.Oz.


1982 R100RSR100RS supergallery. https://boxerboy81.smugmug.com/R100RS
2006 K1200R.
1994 R1100GS.
hal
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:46 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by hal »

What about the ear in the top, could that be worn so the angle somehow gets wrong?
Hal

'74 R90/6
'97 R850R
r67boxer
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:11 am

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by r67boxer »

hal wrote: Wed Sep 18, 2024 5:05 am What about the ear in the top, could that be worn so the angle somehow gets wrong?
Good point. I checked once on the centre stand and it seems solid. That is, no wobble.

Kevin
User avatar
Zombie Master
Posts: 8821
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:21 am
Location: Vancouver Island BC Canada

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by Zombie Master »

I use a Browns with no problem. I kept the original on as well, on uneven pavement it can be useful.
Any and all disclaimers may apply
r67boxer
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:11 am

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by r67boxer »

I found the spare sides stand. It's exactly the same but appears to be a bit beefier.

Kevin
Attachments
img1(11).jpg
img1(11).jpg (725.26 KiB) Viewed 589 times
Kurt in S.A.
Posts: 1647
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:08 pm

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by Kurt in S.A. »

OK so looks like we've established that your side stand is stock and likely there's nothing wrong with the pivot. It's not like the later style pivot which was prone to spreading the ears and causing the bike to lean. It's still possible that something might be bent up where the stand connects with the engine mount bolt.

I scratch my head to come up with ideas why the bike leans over too much...for your tastes. I have the same stock stand on my /7 and discovered at some point that running the metric tire equivalents for the 3.25/4.00 inch sizes results in the bike standing too upright. The metric tires have a smaller radius so the frame is lower to the ground and that just creates havoc with the geometry. I run only the standard inch-sized tires now, so the lean angle is back. But it's really not much. I'm cautious when I use the side stand and absolutely ensure that the lean is there before I walk away from the bike...to open the garage door for example.

So, the stock setup on my /7 results in a lean of the bike but not much. What could be causing yours to lean so much more? :?:

Kurt
r67boxer
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:11 am

Re: Side stand extender recommendation for /5

Post by r67boxer »

I never thought about that. The tires were put on just before I bought the bike by the PO. They pretty much look like off road tires (see image) - Dunlop Gold Seal K70. According to the Dunlop site they are also used for dual sport applications. The thickness of the tread could very well account for the extra lean.

Kevin
Attachments
img1(12).jpg
img1(12).jpg (240.65 KiB) Viewed 569 times
Post Reply